Please note: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. I also work with other affiliate partners and may be compensated from the links below. Details here.

January 2, 2023

Nikon D750 in 2024: The Golden Mean of Nikon Full-Frame Camera Lineup (Review)

By Zarina Full Frame DSLRs, Nikon Cameras, Photography, Reviews 44 Comments

Welcome to my Nikon D750 review! (2024 Update)

You might be wondering:

Considering that it was launched in 2014, Is Nikon D750 worth buying in 2024?

My honest opinion? YES.

Even though we see an advancement in technologies, many professional photographers would tell you that this DSLR is good to go for at least next 5 years.

The truth is, Nikon D750 still remains to be one of the top-performing full-frame (FX) cameras on the market today.

Reasons why you’ll love this camera:

fantastic image quality,
great low light performance,
good AF and burst rate up to 6.5 fps,
tilting LCD screen,
fabulous dynamic range,

(Just to name a few.)

Best of all?

Today, the price of this full-frame Nikon DSLR is under $2000 USD!

Without a doubt, if you’re getting into the professional market, you can’t go wrong with this camera as a start. (And the GLOWING Amazon reviews confirm it.)

==> Click here to compare the prices today.

Nikon D750 Review 2024 (Summary)

Nikon D750 FX-format Digital SLR Camera Body

Reasons to Buy:

great Nikon D750 price today (under $2000)
sweet dynamic range & sharp images
good 51 point AF system, even when shooting in low light
advanced ergonomics and customizable controls
high ISO performance
burst rate up to 6.5 frames per second
video mode with Full HD shooting at 60 fps
exposure metering for old non-AF lenses works
interval mode (helps when photographing fireworks and lightning)

Reasons to Avoid:

no touchscreen
no 1/8000 shutter speed
maximum speed in RAW is limited to 15 frames
no Picture Control button (as seen on D810)

What to keep in mind:

max shutter speed is 1/4000 s (though you might not always need it)
24 MP resolution, a lot lighter and easier to save images compared to D810
not a 4K body but 1080p is great
it’s a top full-frame DSLR for still photography

Find the Best Deal

Nikon D750 Pros & Cons (Video Review)

When I started a YouTube channel, I decided to record a video of whether Nikon D750 is worth buying, with some pros and cons.

Check it out:

==> Subscribe to my YouTube channel for more videos!

(For those of you who prefer text-based reviews, then keep on reading.)

What’s So Special About This Full-Frame DSLR?

Look:

A few years ago, a lot of Nikonians were expecting a fast reportage camera at an affordable price and at the same time with an advanced functionality.

While Nikon D610 and D810 turned out to be very successful, they didn’t suit everyone.

Why?

Because for some D610 was too simple, and for others D810 was too advanced and too expensive.

And in 2014, a new DSLR was introduced – Nikon D750. Basically it’s the golden mean, an ideal compromise.

However, 6 years later people wonder – is it still worth it in 2024?

Especially considering the current Nikon D750 price?

Well, in my opinion, not only is D750 worth buying in 2024 but its price also dropped. It now costs less than $2000, which is a steal!

Yes, the technology has advanced but many photographers will likely argue that you could easily use this Nikon DSLR for the next few years.

Anyway…

In this review, I will try to discuss most important features and characteristics, and share some sample images and a few lens recommendations.

A Few Words About Camera Design/Build Quality

Find the Best Deal

To start off, this FX camera is pretty light.

(To be specific, it weighs 750 g including batteries).

To give you perspective:

If you’ve ever owned Nikon D7100, you’ll see that they are pretty much the same size. However, D7100 is a crop sensor camera, which makes D750 a very compact full-frame DSLR.

What you might really like about this Nikon is that it has a deep hand grip and so it’ll be very comfortable for you to hold it.

Tilting screen is extremely useful, especially when shooting macro or certain events.

(And the dual SD memory cards are definitely a bonus.)

The overall build quality is excellent.

The body is made with magnesium alloy and carbon fibre construction and it is environmentally sealed.

In other words, thanks to the camera’s solid construction, you’ll be able to work under adverse weather conditions.

How Good Is the Image Quality in D750?

As you already know by now, D750 has a full-frame (35.9 x 24 mm) sensor with 24 MP.

Fun fact:

Contrary to current trends, this DSLR has anti-aliasing filter (also called low pass filter). Basically, AA filter helps eliminate the moiré issue.

Here’s an example of moiré on the shirt because of its fine pattern:

This being said:

Cameras like Nikon D5300, D3300, D7100, D810 don’t have low-pass filter and this allows to increase detail of the images produced.

D750 vs D7100

While image detail is great in D750, some might argue that’s it’s a bit better in D7100 because of the absence of low-pass filter in the latter.

Read my in-depth Nikon D7100 review here.

It’s important to remember that the pixel density in D750 is much lower, and in this case it’s better to lose a bit of detail than get a higher risk of moiré in the photos.

D750 vs D810

Truth is:

D750 has fabulous dynamic range and IQ.

And here some might argue that Nikon D810 is a better option than D750. While I agree that it’s better in many ways, it’s also a lot more expensive (and definitely not recommended for complete beginners).

Read my in-depth Nikon D810 review here.

But I digress.

Point is, the image quality in D750 is fantastic.

When you start shooting, you won’t have any reasons to worry about detail. I mean you can take shots outdoors at ISO 10,000 and you’ll have super clean photos.

Best of all?

The level of quality in low-light is amazing.

Nikon D750 review 2022: Excellent image quality in low-light (sample photo). — Nikon D750 · 20.0mm · ƒ/1.8 · 15/1s · ISO 50

What about color rendering?

Just like most Nikon cameras, D750 has amazing color rendering capabilities.

Even if you were to adjust “saturation” in Picture Controls, the images will look vivid without losing its “natural” state.

What I’m trying to say is that the color of the sky in your images will look natural, just the way your eye saw it during the shooting.

Last but not least:

Remember that you’re dealing with a full-frame sensor camera. This means that you can play with shallow depth of field (DOF).

Due to the large size of the sensor, you can achieve a spectacular background blur, even when using a wide-angle lens.

Truth is, you can get beautiful bokeh with almost any lens.

How awesome is that?

Nikon D750 Autofocus System

Look:

The speed and accuracy of autofocus, as well as camera’s overall speed are the things that largely determine camera’s applicability in reportage photography, and for professional work in general.

So, here I’ll mention a few points regarding AF.

Nikon D750 has a 51 point system with 15 cross type and one of the advantages of it is that it can cover a large area of the frame.

(And you can comfortably work with large aperture lenses).

Now…

It also focuses well in dim light situations.

(After all, a lot of people buy this DSLR for its ability to take awesome shots in low-light.)

Anyway, it has the usual AF modes:

AF-A for beginners who don’t know where to start,
AF-S for still photography, and,
AF-C for shooting subjects that need continuous autofocus.

(You can adjust modes to your taste.)

I’ll say this:

If you were to shoot running dogs or quickly moving kids, you’d have absolutely no problem autofocusing.

Also as you can see from the image above, D750 also has U1/U2 custom modes.

For example:

You can configure one for nature photography with high level of sharpness and rich colors, and the other one for portraits.

And last thing:

Given that this camera has 6.5 fps burst rate, it can also work for sports action shots.

Note:

If you’re looking for the best sports cameras (and lenses) right now, read this guide.

Don’t get me wrong:

Most modern digital cameras that came after D750 certainly have better autofocus in many ways but what what you get here certainly is best value for your buck.

I mean you’re getting a nice full-frame DSLR for less than $2000!

One of the best photography deals, in my honest opinion.

Camera’s Video Capabilities

Nikon D750 can shoot video in resolutions up to 1920 x 1080 at a rate of up to 60 frames per second.

Now…

While video is pretty good, you should know that the autofocus in video is somewhat slow and it has no 4K.

(But 1080p is great though).

But let’s face it, Canon or Sony modern cameras do a lot better job when it comes to video features.

Bottom line?

While Nikon D750 happens to have decent video features, I believe it’s the best full-frame for still photography.

(Especially considering it being under $2000 today.)

The Built-In Flash

The maximum speed of the built-in flash in FP mode is 1/250. It will certainly affect your battery life.

Now, if you’re not in FP mode the speed is at 1/200 which is enough for most cases.

Keep in mind though that if you’ll need to highlight shadows under the bright sun, you won’t be able to do so without neutral filter or external flash.

Good news…

Fortunately, the camera has HDR mode, which partially helps to solve the problem of a large range of brightness should you encounter it.

One more thing to mention:

Flash supports command mode. That is, without any additional synchronizers, you can control other external Nikon flashes with TTL support (remote control of exposure).

FAQ About the Shutter Speed

So, is the 1/4000s shutter a big issue?

In my opinion, it’s enough for enthusiast photographers, but for some pros it’s important to have a shutter of 1/8000s minimum.

In practice, it isn’t that bad though.

Number 1:

You can easily shoot during golden hours with a shutter 1/4000s, ISO 100 and f/1.4 aperture.

Number 2:

Nikon D750 has the ability expand down to ISO 50, which you can totally use.

Keep in mind that at ISO 50, you’ll have narrower dynamic range (more subtle differences between highlight and shadow areas).

Nikon D750 Battery Life (Issues?)

Personally, I always look at battery life.

So…

Nikon D750 comes with 1900 mAh EN-EL15 Li-on battery. (Same as in D7000, D7100, D610 and D810).

This should be enough for about 900-1100 shots.

I’m sure you’ll have even more power if you don’t go crazy with Live View mode and constant transfer of pics via Wi-Fi.

Bottom line:

You won’t have a situation when you shoot for half a day and the battery just dies on you.

(By the way, I highly recommend you also get a MB-D16 battery grip.)

Lenses to Consider for D750

Look:

If you’re not a pro, I’d say you should keep it simple to start. Try to learn more about your camera and photography in general.

The 2 inexpensive starter lenses you can go with are 50 mm f/1.8g and 85 mm f/1.8g.

Now…

It’s easier to provide lens recommendations if I know exactly what your genre is, your budget, whether you prefer fix or zoom etc.

In any case, here are some suggestions:

5 Best Lenses for Nikon D750

50 mm f/1.8 prime lens is a great one to start with (good price/value ratio)
28-300 mm awesome all-in-one lens (especially if you like to travel light)
16-35 mm (this wide-angle lens is a must for landscape photographers)
24-120 mm lens is a decent one for beginners (kit lens)
70-300 mm is a telephoto lens on a budget (under $200)

These lenses sure are worth considering.

(And f you have any further questions, feel free to ask in the comments!)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Nikon d750 a professional camera?

Yes, this full-frame DSLR falls into the pro series category. A lot of professional photographers use D750 and absolutely love it.

Is Nikon d750 good in low light?

Yes. As you’ve seen from the image earlier, the low light performance is actually one of its great strengths.

Nikon D750 vs Z6?

A lot of people asked me lately whether they should go for Z6 instead of D750.

Truth is, these cameras have a lot of similarities in terms of battery life, ISO performance, dynamic range and color depth.

Now…

If you absolutely need great video capabilities (4K, slow mo, focus peaking etc), then choose Z6. But if your main photography style involves shooting sports or birds with long lenses, then choose D750.

==> Check out the Nikon Z6 review.

Does Nikon D750 shoot 4k?

No. It does not.

These days, a lot of photographers (especially those that are into videos) consider 4k shooting a golden feature in cameras. It’s true it gives you a lot of edge when it comes to quality, but there’s always that trade off between quality and file size.

I’ll be honest with you…

Not all photographers appreciate 4k shooting. And others don’t even find it necessary. It’s just like a bonus feature, but without it, your gear’s video shooting capabilities will still be fine.

This is true for the D750. Despite not having the 4k video shooting, you can still record at full HD with 1080p resolution at 60 fps.

Nikon D750: Best Value Full-Frame Camera!

Tree/nature photography with Nikon D750 full-frame camera (review) — Nikon D750 · 105.0mm · ƒ/14.0 · 1/200s · ISO 280

I will say this:

Today, this Nikon D750 offers a great compromise between quality and price on the full-frame DSLR market.

Let me mention the reasons why it’s worth considering:

amazing image quality,
intuitive interface,
good autofocus system,
amazing dynamic range,
excellent low-light performance
Nikon D750 price today being under $2000

And overall it’s a sweet camera to work with. Many photographers will agree with me here.

This beauty will work for advanced enthusiasts who decided to upgrade to a full-frame sensor camera, as well as commercial photographers who make a living with photography.

Now…

Based on what we covered in this review today, it becomes obvious that Nikon D750 is worth buying in 2024.

All in all:

It’s one of the best full-frame (FX) DSLRs you can get for your buck.

Find the Best Deal

Arguably, Nikon D750 is probably the best semi-pro camera in 2024 that offers a lot of value for your money.

But now, I’d like to hear from YOU:

Have you had any experience with this camera before?
Based on your experience, do you agree that it still works great today?
What do you think about the Nikon D750 price today?

I encourage you to share your questions, concerns and/or suggestions in the comments below.

Click here to jump straight to comment section.

About Author

Zarina

Founder & content creator at Digital World Beauty. My main objective here is to create a valuable resource for photography enthusiasts with honest tech reviews, course recommendations, and how-to tutorials.

44 Comments

Rob D.

Amateur here. Been using Nikon D3200 for about 5 yrs and now I feel like I want something more. Seems I’ve outgrown my camera and am ready to upgrade my dSLR.

I’m doubting between D7500, D750 and Canon 6D II.

I shoot a variety of subjects… landscapes, some events, night sky, portraits etc. Not for commercial purposes but for my own pleasure.

What’s your advice? Which one is better?
November 9, 2018 Reply

Zarina

Hi Rob,

Canon is good but wouldn’t say it’s better. It’s totally different from Nikon cameras (guess I’m stating the obvious) and you’ll have buy at least one lens with it.

Here are your options:

Take a look at the Nikon lenses you already have. If they are marked with letters DX, then you should go with D7500.

(Btw, did you know that D7500 was voted by EISA as best prosumer DSLR camera 2017-2018?)

Anyway, if you don’t have DX lenses, then you can consider D750. You can buy it with the kit lens and I think you’ll be pleased with the results.
November 9, 2018 Reply

Beck Russell

With the D750, you can still use DX lenses, as long as it has the same mount (which it should), and it will use a “DX Crop mode” giving it the capability to use these lenses with no vignetting.
February 4, 2019 Reply

Zarina

Thanks for clarifying this bit, Beck. Appreciate your input!

Curious, what advice would you give Rob? D7500, D750 or Canon 6D II considering his photography style?
February 4, 2019 Reply

Peter

Hi 🙂
Just found your website, love it.

I’m presently using a Canon EOS 80D, and have been planning on upgrading to full frame for some time, since I want to do some professional photography (portrait and event).

However, I’ve become frustrated with Canon and their pricing policies, not to talk about their new camera and lens series. While I do find the RF mount very interesting, their insistence on only making very high end and ridiculous priced lenses (besides the 35mm) just made me have it.

I had been looking at the EOS R, which still isn’t exactly there. I know that the first professional or semi-professional RF mirrorless camera will be on the expensive side of the 5D mark IV. I took a look to see what other options there were in the same price range as the EOS R, and what do I see: the Sony A7 III. Seriously, this is what Canon offer their users.

That made me look around for other options than Canon. I pretty much decided to sell all.my Canon gear right there, but I still haven’t settled on which new system to invest in.

However, Nikon, with the D750, makes a compelling case. Getting that, and the 24-70mm f/2.8 Tamron G2, is a very good start. That can be expanded with the 70-200mm f/2.8 G2, and their 35mm, 45mm, and 85mm primes. I’ve been very impressed with their lenses on my Canon, and really want to add them to a new kit.

However, I’m not a 100% sure yet. I am really strongly considering going mirrorless, particularly either the before mentioned A7 III, though my budget wouldn’t allow me the same level of lens/es at first (would be with the kit lens), or getting into Fujifilm with the X-T3. But I’ve been hearing too many bad stories about defect cameras, software errors, and ineffective customer service. I don’t know if they’re any worse than other brands, I really want to go with them, but if I’m going to do professional work, I need something which works and can be relied upon. And I’m convinced that that’s the case for Nikon.

I would love to hear your thoughts on it. Events also include concerts and lowlight situations, so I’m definitely focused on lowlight performance of the cameras.

And thanks for your insights:)
October 11, 2019
Zarina

Hi Peter,

Glad you enjoyed your experience here! Comments like these inspire me to do better!

Just so you know, I’m on vacation now and I’m writing my response on my smartphone, so it might be a little shorter than I usually do. But it’ll be as straightforward as always 🙂

Portraits:

As a rule, for portraits shots I recommend Nikon D750, Sony a7R III and Nikon D850 with a 70-200mm lens (full post here).

Regarding Fuji X-T3:

Honestly, like you I would probably choose a different camera, especially when planning to do it professionally. Just to be safe!

Low light photography:

In general, for low light shooting you need a camera with a large sensor and wide aperture (f/1.2, f/1.4 or f/1.8). Also, it’s important that the camera has image stabilization to compensate for the possible minor shake (and therefore avoid blurring).

Now…

D750 certainly is a sweet camera but considering you need a good low light performance, out of all the options you mentioned a7 III would probably work best for you. IMHO.

Bobby in the comments below also was asking about a7 III and I mentioned that Sony would be slightly better, especially for portraits and wedding due to its eye AF that will increase your hit rate on the eyes. (Do keep in mind that you’ll need to spend some time setting up its autofocus system though.)

Last thing:

At the moment, this Sony camera is below $2000 on Amazon US and only 1 left in stock. So if you decide to go with this one, you might want to order it soon.

I hope this helps and let me know if you have any further questions, Peter!

P.S. Thanks for providing detailed info, it’s easy to answer when I know what exactly people are looking for! 🙂
October 11, 2019

Rob D.

To answer your comment earlier… I have kit lens 18-55 dx and 70-200 dx.

I’m most worried about Nikon D7500 vs D750.

If I take the D7500 based on the lenses I currently have, will I sacrifice the level of quality by giving up on D750? Do they differ a lot? Or maybe I won’t feel the difference?

November 9, 2018 Reply

Zarina

Who knows? Here’s the matter: only YOU know just exactly where you’ve outgrown the capabilities of your current DSLR, and only you know what you want to expect in a new camera. It all depends on what and where you are shooting.

For example:

Nikon D750 might better suit for landscapes given its element of plasticity of the images. And in reportage photography, D7500 might be a better choice given its higher burst mode (continuous shooting).

Besides, maybe it’s the lenses that limit your photography.

In any case, when making camera-related decisions you should consider what is it that you shoot, where you shoot and what you shoot with.
November 9, 2018 Reply

Tom Potter

Sony IMX128AQP – this is the sensor that you’ll find in Nikon D750, D600 and D610 (same one on all 3 cameras).

Nikon D750 vs D610:

Indeed, D750 is better than D610 when it comes to image noise but this is likely because of the in-camera noise reduction. But the fact is both cameras perform similarly, whether it’s portraits, sports, landscapes, street photos, or just daily photography.

Keep in mind that the difference in autofocus is more significant especially when it comes to shooting in low light.

Nikon D750 vs 610 vs Canon 5D III:

Having both D750 and D610 as well as Canon Mark 3, I can confirm that you can work with all 3 about the same way thought Canon also doesn’t do well in low light – this is where Nikon D750 shines.

Dynamic range:

Frankly Canon has a disgusting dynamic range. It’s not even close to D610 or D750. Image noise… Something to note is that if try to pull shadow detail from raw files in Canon you’ll see a LOT of noise that’s pretty much impossible to get rid of. Different story with Nikon DSLRs – they do a lot better of a job here.

Nikon cameras have a wider dynamic range just a bit but… BUT!! If you shoot at high ISO right away instead of using low ISO and then trying to pull shadow detail etc, then the 5D camera sensor will give out similar results as D750!

It’s a fact and because of that Canon becomes a great working tool. There’s also 1 point that most people tend to overlook.. a pixel-level sharpness in cameras. M3 is great in this sense a lot better than D750 or D610.

DSLR viewfinder sizes:

Here only D810 can be compared with Canon 5D III. And this is one of the most important things when you do real photography job!

So, personally I almost always take 5D because of its large viewfinder, autofocus and final details of the images. WDR isn’t always needed and same goes for built-in flash too. (Recently I bought viewfinder magnifier and it was easier for me to work wit Nikon DSLRs now.)

In my opinion if you’re choosing your first camera then you can go with D610 and an absolutely beautiful Nikon 28-300 lens for less than $1000.

I also have Canon 28-300 lens, it’s beautiful, friendly and efficient to work with but 1.7kg + 1kg camera + huge dimensions have their own limitations. And the price is like 3x more expensive than Nikon lens. Certainly a huge difference!

#my2cents

November 13, 2018 Reply

Zarina

Hey Tom,

Thanks so much for sharing your experience and your opinion. I’m sure others will benefit from it.

To add a few points to your comment:

1) The sensor in D750, D600, D610 might be the same but the skin tones are different and they are not in favour of the latter two. If you use the comparometer here and compare reference images from DSLRs side-by-side, you’ll see the differences in images.

2) Canon 5D III certainly is on par with Nikon D810. Can’t argue with that.

3) Out of all cameras mentioned above, I’d likely go with D810. BUT… I definitely don’t recommend it for total beginners in photography (I explain why in this review of mine).

Once again, thanks so much for leaving such a wonderful comment, Tom. Clearly you know what you’re talking about!
November 13, 2018 Reply

Martin

Hi Zarina, excellent review! Do you think there is a difference between the D750 and D810 in ISO 100 vs ISO 64 (dynamic range). I like to shoot Landscapes mostly and i don’t know if that difference in base ISO makes a difference.
Right now the difference in price between those two is $400.

Thanks a lot!

November 22, 2018 Reply

Zarina

Hi Martin, thank you!

Well, first of all, having D810 at ISO 64 means that you will more light in the image, more dynamic range and less digital noise, especially if you were to shoot in low-light conditions.

Now, while image quality/DR is better in D810 at base ISO, D750 is known to perform very well at very high ISO values.

Point is…

Reducing base ISO from 100 to 64 further improved dynamic range in D810, combine it with awesome image sharpness and resolution and you have yourself a dream DSLR for various photography genres.

I have to warn you though.

If you’re fairly new to photography, don’t buy D810 as it’s way too challenging for beginners. I give my honest opinion about this camera here.

So, how to choose between Nikon D750 vs D810?

I will say this:

Landscape photographers (with experience) need high resolution and dynamic range, so they’ll likely lean towards D810. That is, if you want an uncompromisingly high image quality.

But if you’re looking for a lighter, smaller and cheaper DSLR, then D750 is a great choice too.

Basically, professional photographers choose D810 and D750 is more of an all-around camera at a cheaper price.

I hope this answers your questions/concerns Martin?

If you have any further questions, feel free to ask and I’ll be happy to help. Also, I would love to hear which camera you decided to go with (and why). 🙂
November 22, 2018 Reply

Martin Ibarra

Zarina! sorry for the delay!

Finally i got a D810, i had some experience with cameras so i feel very comfortable with it. The more proffesional body of the D810 it’s incredible, the only thing missing is the tilting screen of the D750 (kudos the D850 for that).

My girlfriend got a D750 so i can compare them first hand and the highlight of the D810 is the number of pixels. You can crop a lot more without losing sharpness.

In the dynamic range department i don’t see a considerable difference between the two, also, i always shoot in ISO64 (i do landscapes most of the time) but when we shoot in high ISOs you can tell the difference (i suppose the less megapixels from the D750 help in that matter).

Well, sorry for my english, it’s not my primary language so i couldn’t do a more thorough review.

Thanks!
April 5, 2019 Reply

Zarina

Hi Martin,

Good to hear from you! Your English is actually great, I perfectly understand you.

Thanks so much for sharing your thoughts on both the D750 and D810, other website readers will benefit from your comment as well. Especially if they are in the similar situation/same photography genre as you.

So happy to hear my reviews were helpful to you and congrats on your purchase!!! 🙂

Happy shooting,
Zarina
April 9, 2019 Reply

Chrissie Spurgeon

I agree with what you say in this review, I recently got D750 and I love it. Landscapes and portraits are my thing. Does a great job with low light too.

What I don’t understand is how do I turn off bracketing??

I’m forced to snap 3 images (and all 3 shots come out with different exposures.) I tried to search online but couldn’t find the answer, hopefully you know the answer?

Chrissie

December 7, 2018 Reply

Zarina

Hi Chrissie,

Yep, it’s a sweet camera indeed. Congrats on your purchase!

Regarding your question:

To turn off bracketing, press the Fn button and rotate the main dial (the one under the thumb from the viewfinder side) until the number of shots in the bracketing sequence is zero (0F), and the M symbol is no longer displayed on the control panel of the camera.

If it doesn’t help right away, don’t despair as there are non-obvious nuances. But I’m sure you’ll get it done 🙂

Good luck and have fun photographing!
December 7, 2018 Reply

Robert

Hi Zarina, good review. I own a D750 and am happy with how it performs. I use it for photographing tennis and also for photographing press conferences and action at Parliament House here in Canberra.
“burst rate up to 6.5 frames per second” – I never get close to that rate. I don’t know if it is due to settings or what the problem is.

February 5, 2019 Reply

Zarina

Hi Robert,

Good to hear from you again. I responded to your other comment on sports photography article but somehow I missed this one (don’t think I got email notification for the second comment.) Not sure about the burst rate in your case, to be honest.

Before you mentioned you were doubting between Nikon D5 and Sony a9. Have you decided to continue using D750 for now and upgrade later?

Thanks for stopping by!
February 7, 2019 Reply

BobbyK

Can you help me please? Should I get this Nikon with the kit lens 24-120mm (New) or get Sony A7iii for body only (New). The fact is nowadays in my country they have similiar price, and I only have 1 lens 85mm f1.8 for sony. I’d like to start my journey as freelance photographer event, wedding, portrait. Thank you so much for your help. 😀

February 22, 2019 Reply

Zarina

Hi Bobby,

EDIT:

Initially, I responded to your question thinking you were talking about a7R III, not a7 III. It’s night time here, so forgive me for inattention.

I will leave the response about a7R III anyway and add a paragraph about a7 III.

Nikon D750 vs. Sony a7 III:

The image quality is pretty much the same, ISO is slightly better in a7 III and the autofocus is better in Sony.

While both are great, a7 III is slightly better. Especially with portraits and weddings due to its eye autofocus that’ll increase your hit rate on the eyes (but you’ll need to spend some time setting up the AF system).

[ORIGINAL RESPONSE below]

Nikon D750 vs. Sony a7R III:

Truth is, the a7R Mark III is the best mirrorless camera on the market. Actually, it’s what I recommend for landscapes and portrait photography. But they work well in any other genre too, weddings included.

Without a doubt, many photographers will suggest you go with the Sony camera as there are a lot more advantages to it than D750.

It’s more compact, has more detail, sharper images, more features and overall offers more value for money (especially considering that you’re getting it at the same price of D750).

And you could certainly work with 85mm f/1.8 lens for wedding photography (specifically bridal portraits and group shots).

Over time, as you grow as a wedding photographer, you can upgrade to 70-200 f/2.8 lens. It’s a must lens for wedding ceremonies, especially when shooting inside a poorly-lit church/your religious institution.

Now…

I understand that the lens might be pricey, so if you can’t afford to buy it now, you can always rent it. (At least, I hope it’s possible to do in your country.)

In the meantime, you can work with the camera you already have.

Hope this helps, Bobby!
February 24, 2019 Reply

BobbyK

thank you so much for your help Zarina 😀
February 24, 2019 Reply

Zarina

Glad to help, Bobby! 🙂
February 24, 2019 Reply

BobbyK

Hi Zarina,

I got D750 over the A7 III in the beginning of March, now a few months with D750 and I had a lot of good experience with some drawbacks of course.

– I like the ergonomic, important point for me (comfort)
– long battery life,
– WDR help me much while editing,
– great ISO performance in lowlight,
– 2 SD Card slots,
– build in motor AF for AF-D lenses,
– fast and decent buffer today for my needs
– lightweight for a FF DSLR
– tilt screen
– instant starter (on/off) and shoot

In my experience, this year and maybe 3 more years ahead, shooting wedding photography, pre-wedding, portrait, concert, lowlight, some sports, cityscape, landscapes, still life photography, group shots, travelling, family event, the D750 is enough.

I realize that A7 III camera offers more features that will help me a lot as a photographer but it’s not as great for me in terms of ergonomics.

And that’s a bit sharing from me Zarina.
November 6, 2019
Zarina

Hi Bobby!

So good to hear from you 🙂

I’m happy you made the decision and thanks for coming back here and sharing your thoughts on D750 with us!

And you’re right. Many professional photographers will actually agree with you that this Nikon model will be good for at least next 5 years, and for those particular genres.

It’s a sweet DSLR and I often recommend it on Digital World Beauty. Hell, even judging by this review it’s obvious haha.

Thanks again for sharing your experience here!
November 21, 2019

Michael Barone

I just picked up this camera after using the D610 since it came out. The difference is amazing. I shot a concert with the D750 paired with a Sigma 70-200 f.2.8 and it worked extremely well.

Great bang for your buck!

July 30, 2019 Reply

Zarina

Thank you so much for sharing your experience, Michael!

Without a doubt this year the the Nikon D750 is a best value full frame camera. Whenever I recommend it on Digital World Beauty, it becomes clear to everyone that it’s one of my personal favourites haha.

Good to hear from photographers in the comments who confirm that, indeed, D750 is a great DSLR!
September 10, 2019 Reply

Shawn

Am looking to purchase a D750 but can afford to wait. Do you think the price will drop a significant amount when the successor (D760 as rumored) comes out, which is hopefully soon?

September 12, 2019 Reply

Zarina

Hey Shawn,

If by “significant” you mean $500 price drop, then I doubt it.

1) First of all, as a rule cameras over $1000 rarely have major discounts.

2) Besides, they’ve already reduced the cost to less than $1500 USD (on Amazon).

I believe the original price of Nikon D750 was $2300, which makes the today’s price a VERY good deal for a professional level full-frame DSLR with lots of potential.

This being said:

You might see a $100 discount or something, but I wouldn’t expect a significant price drop.

Of course, I can’t predict the future, but these are my thoughts.

Hope this helps Shawn, let me know if you have any further questions!
September 12, 2019 Reply

Peter

Hi Zarina,

For some reason I couldn’t reply to your reply, so it has to come in as a new comment 🙂 And sorry for being a bit slow, it’s been a hectic period.

So I decided on the Fuji in the end anyway. I had decided for the Sony, and was also recommended it, but I talked with other local photographers, who are doing weddings, events, or concert/stage performance photography. While the events photographers almost all as one recommended DSLR, the others were either using Sony or Fujifilm.

In general they all recommended Sony for low light performances and over all image quality, but what I was told by the Fujifilm users was that they had decided for Fujifilm because of the company’s policy in development of cameras, publishing of firmware, the option for them to use JPEGs sooc (not only, but also), and the cost.

While they did acknowledge the difference in low light performance, two of them, who previously used Sony, claimed that the difference wasn’t that crucial, and was acceptable in light of other things they got with Fujifilm. One of the main considerations was the price of building a kit.

I live in Israel, so the prices here are different from both the US and EU. And we have to pay import taxes on everything above 75 USD. The X-T3 is sold for 1412 USD right now, 1835 with the kit lens. The X-H1 with grip is also sold for 1412 USD. The Sony A7III is sold for 2118 USD, and 2485 with the kit lens.

I got the X-T3 with kit lens and four years of warranty/insurance for 1835 – the insurance was important for me.

I really considered the A7 III strongly, but in the end decided that considering the price, I didn’t need the extra low light performance or dynamic range.

Maybe in the future, if photography becomes a full time job ( here’s to me hoping 🙂 ), I will decide differently, but with my style of photography, which is somewhat documentary and preferring to stand out, as well as budget, I decided for Fujifilm.

If money hadn’t been a concern, I would have gone with Sony. But from my talks with the other photographers, and what I saw from those who did shoot with Fujifilm, I’m fairly certain about my choice 🙂 And this will also be a good motivation to begin doing some video as well 🙂

Thanks again, really appreciating your time, particularly considering that you were (are?) on vacation.

October 22, 2019 Reply

Zarina

Hi Peter!

I, too, apologize for the late response. I’ve had a busy few weeks after I came back from the trip! Just getting back to all the comments here.

Anyway, it’s good to hear from you again!

And great to know that you found the right camera for you, considering your budget and your current needs. It’s amazing to connect with photographers and hear different opinions to make an educated buying decision.

Actually yeah, now that you mentioned documentary, those using Fuji would argue these cameras are pretty great for documenting life as you see it. Fuji X100F, for example, is amazing for this street shooting. Mainly because it has the 35mm lens which is sort of a benchmark for documentary/street photography (only downside is that it’s a fixed lens).

Also, you must love the Fuji’s cool retro design, no!?

I’d love to hear your personal experience with your X-T3 after you use a bit more.

Thank you again for stopping by, Peter! I’ll see you around 🙂
November 21, 2019 Reply

Pasindu Suraj

Hi, I’m currently using a nikon dx advance entry camera (d5300) and planning to upgrade to a full-frame camera. I considered to buy a Nikon d750, but some people advised me not to buy it since it is almost 5+ years old and the technology has been changed.

So, is it really worth buying d750 this year and can I be able to move along with it for at least 4 to 5 years?

November 17, 2019 Reply

Zarina

Hi Pasindu,

While the Nikon D750 is a bit behind the curve compared to flagship models released this year, it is still an incredibly good DSLR that does the job well.

Truth is, the D750 is a superb choice for most people, considering its solid autofocus system, competitive burst rate and great handling of reasonably high ISO.

And many experienced photographers would argue that it’s totally good to go for the next 5 years.

I’ll mention 2 reasons where this DSLR won’t make sense:

1) If you’re into PRO sports photography and need serious PRO sports burst rates. If that’s the case consider Nikon D500, instead. (Full article on sports cameras + lenses here.)

2) If you’re in the fashion photography business and need high end retouching capability and higher resolution. If that’s your case, then Nikon D810 is a great alternative choice for portrait studio photography.

This being said…

I think you’re safe to go with this Nikon and I really think it’s worth buying D750 in 2020, unless you really need specific functions that this camera doesn’t have (for pro sports or high-end fashion photography).

I hope this helps and let me know if you have any further questions!
November 22, 2019 Reply

Brin

On paper the D750 is a great addition to the Nikon family and is at the moment a very good buy on price along with ability. However no one as mentioned the D750 recalls and the potential for your new camera to have shutter or sensor problems. This is why its a tough decision to make.
December 4, 2019 Reply

Zarina

I think if we’re talking about “potentials” then every product has a potential to be recalled. But as far as I know, those photographers who do use the D750 (on a professional level) truly enjoy the DSLR and swear by it.

Though I’d say that if you’re really concerned, perhaps it’s best that you go with a different camera so you feel safe. One of DWB readers decided to get the Nikon Z6 instead of D750 and he shared his experience with the Z6 in this post.

Thought you might want to read it too.
December 18, 2019 Reply

John

Hi Zarina,

I am an amateur photographer for approx.5 years, interested mainly in travel and street photography and family/friends moments (event documentary, portraits, kids action etc). I have developed my understanding on technique and I am also interested in buying quality gear but on the same time trying to stay on a budget and not go crazy with exceptional choices such as gear that professionals use.

My current set up is Nikon D3200, Nikon 35 f1.8G, Sigma 17-50f2.8 and Sigma 50-150 HSM OS f2.8. Although I really enjoy my lenses I am starting to notice the limitations of my camera which of course is a cheap and old entry level DSLR (mainly autofocus capabilities and low light performance).

So to get to the point, I am very confused what would be a reasonable upgrade to get to the next level. My first thoughts is go to a used D7200 which is very cheap (~450€) and on the same time has better autofocus, low light performance and I will continue using my 3 lenses. On the other hand I don’t know if it’s worth the difference to go to a Z50 since the D7200 is 5 years old (~1150€ incl. FTZ adapter).

Final thought is to go with an older full frame body such as the D750 (1.000€ with the Nikon 50mm f1.8 on sale) but here the problem is that I should invest big in quality FX lenses in the future, which is something that I am not sure if all this investment does worth it for just a hobbyist like myself. Just to mention that financial-wise I can afford all the above options, however I am trying to make the best value for money choice based on my needs.

I really enjoy the art of photography, I try to invest in quality lenses (this is why I have not upgraded the D3200 before investing in good glass first) and I feel so confused about the reasonable choices.

I would really appreciate if you could help!

January 21, 2020 Reply

Zarina

Hi John,

Thank you for your comment and providing such detailed info. It’s easy to provide answers when I’m aware of many points!

First things first:

Considering that you’re a hobbyist photographer, going full-frame isn’t necessarily the answer.

In my opinion, you’re on the right track with the z50 or D7200 (D7500 can also be thrown into the mix). Lately, a lot of photographers prefer going mirrorless but these DSLRs certainly are capable cameras.

Hell, even the D7100 can still rock it! And, by the way, if you’re looking to get the BEST VALUE, then it might be the answer for you.

Speaking of…

I JUST updated my D7100 review for this year and I think it’d be a perfect read for you.

In there, if you scroll past the video review, you’ll see a section where I talk about why D7x00 series are a great choice and I offer the overview of this series lineup.

(It might give you some perspective.)

Here’s my suggestion:

Compose a list of the things that you want to improve in your D3200. Then make a list of pros and cons of the cameras you are looking at upgrading to, and compare that to what you need your upgrade for.

(And definitely consider the low light performance of those cameras, since you mentioned that you’re interested in low-light shots.)

I hope this helps, John!

Let me know if you have any further questions 🙂
January 22, 2020 Reply

Jen

Hi Zarina!

I really enjoyed this review. Your enthusiasm and ability to relay information is so great.

I used to shoot on the D7100 (great DSLR & still recommend if anyone is considering it). My camera was stolen recently and therefor i am looking to upgrade to Full Frame.

I have been looking at my options, my biggest concern was – **is the 750 obsolete & still worth buying in 2020? **

The price is just so on point & tempting as opposed to say the 850 and the newer 780. Considering all but my 50mm lens was stolen with my gear, the 750 seems like a great value when you take into account new lenses, battery grip, etc. etc. that i’ll also need to replace.

So, ok i think i am rambling- but thanks for this review. I am definitely considering just going with the older 750 as my first full frame at this point.

I shoot mainly portrait & street, and my 7100 performed really well for me so maybe i am on the right track?

Again, thank you for your review and time! 🙂

January 26, 2020 Reply

Zarina

Hi Jen!

Sorry to hear that your gear was stolen, such a shame!

I agree with you on the D7100, I actually had updated my review for 2020 as well, check it out here if you’d like!

Based what you told me, I think Nikon D750 certainly is worth considering as your first full-frame DSLR, especially considering how much it costs today.

Many photographers I’ve spoken with would agree that this camera would be good to go for another 5 years despite the technological advancements in today’s equipment.

Would love to hear back from you when you experiment with D750 and how you like it! 🙂

I really appreciate your kind words, it inspires me to do better!

And, by the way, I’ve finally decided to get on YouTube train and go all-in with my YouTube channel. So if you like video-based content as well, you might want to join me there too 🙂

Thank you for your comment and see you around, Jen!
January 26, 2020 Reply

Per Inge Oestmoen

I am the proud owner of Nikon D750 camera. I can testify that it is a very capable tool in 2020, and there is no reason why it would not be equally capable in five or ten years from now. Realistically, the only limitation I have experienced is the max shutter speed of 1/4000 second.

In my opinion, the D750 is an excellent choice, together with the D850. The main difference is of course the possibility of making even larger images from the latter, but not long ago 24 megapixels were considered a good standard for landscapes. The D750 will not let you down.

In fact the D750 also has a major advantage over several newer cameras as the D780, the Z6 and the Z7: The D750 has the option of a vertical control grip with shutter button and controls. The D780, the Z6 and the Z7 has no electrical contacts that enable the use of a vertical grip, and this is a very serious omission by Nikon.

It is incomprehensible that cameras like the D780, Z6 and Z7 cannot use a vertical grip. A vertical grip is nearly indispensable for photographers who often shoot in the vertical position, when the hand has a much more relaxed and stable grip than if a vertical control grip is missing. This alone is a rational reason to choose the D750 over the D780 and Z6, and likewise to choose the D850 over the Z7.

March 3, 2020 Reply

Zarina

I LOVE hearing from my website readers/channel viewers, but when it’s comments like THAT it’s even more amazing. Thank you very much for such an awesome comment!!
March 3, 2020 Reply

Ashok Gogoi

Hi Zarina..

I do have both Canon 5D and Nikon D750.. both are excellent.

But sometimes I feel due to AA filter in Nikon d750 slight reduction in sharpness..

But again when I see some other photographs my thought changes.. Probably improperly focus in some photographs are looking degrading in sharpness..

However I completely agree with your reviews..

Thanks for give me that confidence on my fav Nikon D750..

April 14, 2020 Reply

Zarina

Hi Ashok,

Thank you very much for your input! Nikon D750 proves to be an amazing DSLR indeed and I know plenty of photographers which find it to be one of favourite camera bodies in this category.

Mainly what genre do you use your D750 for? What about Canon 5D?
April 23, 2020 Reply

Scott Murphy

“Yes, the technology has advanced but many photographers will likely argue that you could easily use this Nikon DSLR for the next few years.”

True, it has, but as a working pro, only amateurs really get wrapped around the axle on the techie minutiae stuff like this. The camera is JUST a tool, regardless of the sophistication. I can take better images with my “antique” 12 year old Nikon D700 than 90% of amateurs can with their latest “flavor of the month” camera. Why? Because it is the person BEHIND that camera that actually counts the most. I still use my film cameras too, which must really make me a dinosaur; Nikon FTn, F2A, F4E and Nikkormat FT2 with my manual AIS Lenses (the only lenses I own, not an AF in the bunch) and my beloved Hasselblad 500CM and CZ lenses can still outshoot the overwhelming number of amateurs on the planet for the very same reasons.

Though my go-to digital cameras are a D850 and D500 for the overwhelming amount of my work, my D750 is still in my gear bag and is as relevant as either one of them.

July 28, 2020 Reply

Zarina

Hi Scott,

Thanks so much for your input! Indeed, that is true. Heck, you can take sweet shots even with just a smartphone if you know what you’re doing!

And that’s exactly what Emil Pakarklis, the founder of iPhone Photography School, constantly repeats in his courses. That your iPhone is just a tool, what matters is how you use it.

I’ll be honest, film cameras is something I know about the LEAST. I haven’t even heard of the gear you mentioned. No wonder why I don’t touch this topic on my blog haha.

But Nikon D850 and D500 are beautiful! But serious photographers, the D750 is a great full frame option, ESPECIALLY at the current price tag! I’m sure you’ll agree with me here, right Scott?
July 30, 2020 Reply

Nikon D750 Review 2024 (Summary)

Reasons to Buy:

Reasons to Avoid:

What to keep in mind:

Nikon D750 Pros & Cons (Video Review)

What’s So Special About This Full-Frame DSLR?

A Few Words About Camera Design/Build Quality

How Good Is the Image Quality in D750?

Nikon D750 Autofocus System

Camera’s Video Capabilities

The Built-In Flash

FAQ About the Shutter Speed

Nikon D750 Battery Life (Issues?)

Lenses to Consider for D750

5 Best Lenses for Nikon D750

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Nikon d750 a professional camera?

Is Nikon d750 good in low light?

Nikon D750 vs Z6?

Does Nikon D750 shoot 4k?

Nikon D750: Best Value Full-Frame Camera!

Click here to jump straight to comment section.

About Author

Zarina

Add a Comment